MLB matchup analysis

Rays vs Rangers Prediction, Odds and Model Pick

Sunday, September 6, 2026 at Globe Life Field · 2:35 PM ET

Pass

LyDia decision: Pass on Rays vs Rangers

Lab Rating
5.1/10
Model lean
Rays 62.7%
Market probability
50.0%
Model edge
+12.7%
Best moneyline
-104
Sportsbooks checked
9
LyDia model
62.7%
Market
50.0%

The case for Tampa Bay Rays

Late-inning bullpen advantage
Texas Rangers relievers have a 5.68 ERA over the last 7 days; Tampa Bay Rays relievers have a 4.21. Texas Rangers also have 8 arms pitching on back-to-back days, against 6 for Tampa Bay Rays. If this is still close after six innings, that gap favors Tampa Bay Rays.

The case for Texas Rangers

Their bats are hot: +0.025 wOBA
Texas Rangers is outhitting its own season form over the last 15 days.

Why it is not official

Setup quality below the bar
Lab Rating is 5.1/10, under the 7.2/10 required for an official pick.
Own bullpen carries risk: 7.9/10
The Tampa Bay Rays bullpen comes in tired. A lead after six innings is less safe than usual.
Opponent is swinging it
The other lineup is +0.025 wOBA above its season form over the last 15 days.

Why the setup score is what it is

Conviction: 3.84/10
LyDia leans toward Tampa Bay Rays, but not strongly enough to earn full conviction credit.
Pitching plan: 25.33/40
Ian Seymour rates 69 on LyDia's pitcher score, judged on its own merits (50-80 is the credited range). That is a strong start on its own, and it earns most or all of the available credit here.
Offense: 21.56/50
Tampa Bay Rays's recent form does not clearly outpace Texas Rangers's.

Why the price is what it is

Team strength: 56.7%
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, LyDia's team-strength model alone makes Tampa Bay Rays 56.7% to win. Everything below moves the price from this starting point.
Pitcher score gap: 6 points
The pitcher-score gap favors Tampa Bay Rays by 6 points. This is the biggest single mover of the price -- a large gap moves it a lot, a small gap barely moves it.
Bullpen adjustment: +0.06
The bullpen-fatigue gap between the two pens nudges the price toward Tampa Bay Rays. This moves the price less than the starting pitchers do, since a starter covers more of the game than the bullpen.
Net effect: 56.7% -> 62.7%
Team strength alone had Tampa Bay Rays at 56.7%. After the pitcher and bullpen terms, the price is 62.7% -- the same number shown as Model Lean above.
The verdict LyDia passes. The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.
Read the full model output

The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.

Game information

MatchupTampa Bay Rays at Texas Rangers
DateSunday, September 6, 2026
First pitch2:35 PM ET
VenueGlobe Life Field
Starting pitchersIan Seymour vs MacKenzie Gore
WeatherGame-time forecast: 98°F, 0% precipitation chance, 9 mph wind from SE. This venue has a roof, but the roof status is not confirmed.

Starting pitcher matchup

Full Pitcher Matchup Tool →
Ian SeymourRays · LHP
vs
MacKenzie GoreRangers · LHP
MetricRaysRangers
Pitching planTraditional starterTraditional starter
Expected innings4⅔5⅓
ThrowsLL
LyDia pitcher score (higher is better)6963
ERA (lower is better)4.214.31
WHIP (lower is better)1.141.29
K/9 (higher is better)11.09.8
K-BB% (higher is better)22.6%16.4%
K% (higher is better)29.4%25.5%
BB% (lower is better)6.8%9.0%
BB/9 (lower is better)2.53.5
HR/9 (lower is better)1.61.0
Ground-ball rate39.2%44.4%
Fly-ball rate60.8%55.6%

Pitcher edge: LyDia gives Ian Seymour a 6-point edge over MacKenzie Gore, driven mainly by K-BB% (22.6% vs 16.4%) and BB/9 (2.5 vs 3.5).

How to read this: the scorecards above name the starters; every number lives in this table.

Strikeout Projections Full strikeout projections →

Ian Seymour strikeouts
6.9 LyDia projected Ks
Qualifying projection: OVER 5.5K · +1.4K difference
Market 5.5K · O -136 / U +110 · 4 books
MacKenzie Gore strikeouts
4.0 LyDia projected Ks
Qualifying projection: UNDER 5.5K · -1.5K difference
Market 5.5K · O +128 / U -157 · 4 books

Same data source as the Pitcher Matchup Tool, where every starter on the slate is compared side by side.

Rays are 7-3 in their last 10 and averaging 4.2 runs per game over the last 15 days; Rangers are 4-6 in their last 10 and averaging 5.1 runs per game over the last 15 days. On the season Rays carry the better run differential per game (+0.35 against -0.32).

MetricRaysRangers
Last 107-34-6
Last 10 by venue (away team on the road, home team at home)6-4 on the road6-4 at home
OPS, last 15 days0.7020.780
wOBA, last 15 days (hot/cold read)0.3090.341
Runs per game, last 15 days4.25.1
K% last 15 days (lower is better)15.7%19.1%

Last 15 days only. Hot and cold streaks for all 30 teams live on the Stats page.

30-day offense

Full offense tool →
Last 30 daysRaysRangers
OPS0.7330.691 (-0.024 vs szn)
Runs per game4.68 (+0.164 vs szn)3.93 (-0.176 vs szn)
wOBA (model offense input)0.3220.306 (-0.010 vs szn)
K% (lower is better)16.1% (-2.4% vs szn)22.1% (-0.5% vs szn)

Over the last 30 days the Rays have been the better offense, 0.322 wOBA to 0.306.

Season profile

Full Stats page →
MetricRaysRangers
Record85-5770-73
Run differential / game (team quality)+0.35-0.32
Runs scored / game (offense, season)4.514.10
Runs allowed / game (defense, season, lower better)4.174.43
Season OPS0.7320.715
K% season (lower is better)18.5%22.6%
OPS vs opposing hand (season)0.6870.763

Season-long team quality, not recent form. Run differential and run environment come from the season standings; splits for all 30 teams live on the Stats page, including the run environment table.

Every team on today's slate, on any two axes you pick. Rays and Rangers are highlighted.

Rays
Combined risk
7.9 Tired
Fatigue
7.9 Tired
Efficiency
5.0 Average
Rangers
Combined risk
9.9 High risk
Fatigue
9.2 High risk
Efficiency
3.6 Below average

Risk is what the model actually uses: fatigue blended with how well the pen has pitched. High fatigue with high efficiency is a tired pen that is still getting outs.

MetricRaysRangers
Fatigue7.9/10, Tired9.2/10, High risk
Efficiency5.0/10, Average3.6/10, Below average
Combined risk7.9/10, Tired9.9/10, High risk
Relief innings, last 7 days25.731.7
Back-to-back arms68
7-day ERA4.215.68
7-day WHIP1.321.61

Fatigue measures workload. Efficiency measures recent run prevention. Combined risk is what the moneyline and totals systems use.

Run total projection

Full Totals Projections →
LyDia projection
8.0
Market total
7.5
Projected away runs
4.1
Projected home runs
3.3
Over price
+100
Under price
-107
Tampa Bay Rays team total
4.1 projected
Line 3.5 · O -122 / U -104
No team-total lean
Texas Rangers team total
3.3 projected
Line 3.5 · O -108 / U -110
No team-total lean

The model and market are close. Team totals remain research-only until their graded sample is established.

More games today

All matchups →

Every LyDia pick, graded in public

Free daily model card by email, or open today's full slate. Membership adds delivery before first pitch.

Today's picks Membership

Model outputs are not guarantees. LyDia provides analysis and education only. Every official pick remains visible on the Results page. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.