MLB matchup analysis

Mets vs Rays Prediction, Odds and Model Pick

Wednesday, September 2, 2026 at Tropicana Field · 6:40 PM ET

Pass

LyDia decision: Pass on Mets vs Rays

Lab Rating
6.0/10
Model lean
Rays 73.1%
Market probability
62.0%
Model edge
+11.1%
Best moneyline
-171
Sportsbooks checked
9
LyDia model
73.1%
Market
62.0%

The case for Tampa Bay Rays

Why LyDia leans Tampa Bay Rays
LyDia's model makes Tampa Bay Rays 73.1% to win. No single factor dominates — team strength and the run environment tilt slightly this way, enough to lean Tampa Bay Rays even though it does not clear the bar for a high-confidence pick.

The case for New York Mets

The case is thin
The model finds little going New York Mets's way — it trails on the pitching plan, bullpen, and recent form. The main path to a New York Mets win is variance.

Why it is not official

Setup quality below the bar
Lab Rating is 6.0/10, under the 7.2/10 required for an official pick.
Own bullpen carries risk: 6.1/10
The Tampa Bay Rays bullpen comes in normal. A lead after six innings is less safe than usual.
Cold stretch at the plate
Tampa Bay Rays is -0.025 wOBA below its own season form.

Why the setup score is what it is

Conviction: 9.03/10
LyDia's win probability for Tampa Bay Rays (73.1%) is well clear of a coin flip -- this is a real, stated lean, not a guess.
Pitching plan: 19/30
Griffin Jax rates 65 on LyDia's pitcher score, judged on its own merits (50-80 is the credited range). That is a strong start on its own, and it earns most or all of the available credit here.
Bullpen: 4.44/10
Both bullpens are rated normal -- this is close to a wash, not an advantage either way.
Offense: 27.63/50
Tampa Bay Rays's recent offensive form clearly outpaces New York Mets's over the tracked windows.

Why the price is what it is

Team strength: 59.3%
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, LyDia's team-strength model alone makes Tampa Bay Rays 59.3% to win. Everything below moves the price from this starting point.
Pitcher score gap: 19 points
The pitcher-score gap favors Tampa Bay Rays by 19 points. This is the biggest single mover of the price -- a large gap moves it a lot, a small gap barely moves it.
Bullpen adjustment: -0.015
The bullpen-fatigue gap between the two pens nudges the price toward New York Mets. This moves the price less than the starting pitchers do, since a starter covers more of the game than the bullpen.
Net effect: 59.3% -> 73.1%
Team strength alone had Tampa Bay Rays at 59.3%. After the pitcher and bullpen terms, the price is 73.1% -- the same number shown as Model Lean above.
The verdict LyDia passes. This is a bullpen game -- no confirmed traditional starter, so LyDia does not publish an official pick here.
Read the full model output

This is a bullpen game -- no confirmed traditional starter, so LyDia does not publish an official pick here.

Final result

Mets 10, Rays 4

How the analysis held up

New York Mets won. LyDia's model favored the other side.

Justin Hagenman (New York Mets), the starter LyDia's pitcher score favored, actually outpitched Griffin Jax: 3.0 IP, 1 ER (3.00 ERA) against 2.2 IP, 3 ER (10.13 ERA). The edge held up.

New York Mets scored 10, 6.7 more than the 3.3 pregame projection.

Likely driver: Griffin Jax, the pick's own starter, was rocked for a 10.13 ERA, and New York Mets's offense scored 6.7 more runs than projected.

Game information

MatchupNew York Mets at Tampa Bay Rays
DateWednesday, September 2, 2026
First pitch6:40 PM ET
VenueTropicana Field
Starting pitchersJustin Hagenman vs Griffin Jax
WeatherGame-time forecast: 79°F, 80% precipitation chance, 2 mph wind from W.

Starting pitcher matchup

Full Pitcher Matchup Tool →
Justin HagenmanMets · RHP
vs
Griffin JaxRays · RHP
MetricMetsRays
Pitching planLimited starterLimited starter
Expected innings34⅓
ThrowsRR
LyDia pitcher score (higher is better)7065
ERA (lower is better)3.004.10
WHIP (lower is better)1.001.27
K/9 (higher is better)6.09.6
K-BB% (higher is better)8.3%17.4%
K% (higher is better)16.7%25.5%
BB% (lower is better)8.3%8.1%
BB/9 (lower is better)3.03.1
HR/9 (lower is better)0.01.3
Ground-ball rate14.3%52.0%
Fly-ball rate85.7%48.0%

Pitching plan edge: LyDia gives the New York Mets pitching plan the edge over Griffin Jax (5 points on LyDia's pitcher score). Justin Hagenman is projected for only 3 innings, with the New York Mets bullpen covering the rest -- this compares the New York Mets blended starting-pitcher-and-bullpen quality against Griffin Jax's own line, not two starters directly.

Blended read: For the New York Mets, the bullpen is projected to throw more of the game than Justin Hagenman (about 3 innings for the starter), so LyDia grades that side on a whole-game effective ERA of 3.88 rather than Justin Hagenman's own 3.00. Whole-game, that is 3.51 for the Tampa Bay Rays against 3.88 on the other side, so the blended read leans Tampa Bay Rays.

How to read this: the scorecards above name the starters; every number lives in this table.

Strikeout Projections Full strikeout projections →

Justin Hagenman strikeouts
Not available LyDia projected Ks
Market 2.5K · O -165 / U +130 · 3 books
Griffin Jax strikeouts
4.7 LyDia projected Ks
No K play · +0.2K difference is below LyDia's 0.7K threshold
Market 4.5K · O -109 / U -105 · 5 books

Same data source as the Pitcher Matchup Tool, where every starter on the slate is compared side by side.

Mets are 4-6 in their last 10 and averaging 3.2 runs per game over the last 15 days; Rays are 7-3 in their last 10 and averaging 4.1 runs per game over the last 15 days. On the season Rays carry the better run differential per game (+0.37 against -0.36).

MetricMetsRays
Last 104-67-3
Last 10 by venue (away team on the road, home team at home)5-5 on the road6-4 at home
OPS, last 15 days0.6620.675
wOBA, last 15 days (hot/cold read)0.2920.298
Runs per game, last 15 days3.24.1
K% last 15 days (lower is better)22.7%15.8%

Last 15 days only. Hot and cold streaks for all 30 teams live on the Stats page.

30-day offense

Full offense tool →
Last 30 daysMetsRays
OPS0.742 (+0.047 vs szn)0.746 (+0.013 vs szn)
Runs per game4.44 (+0.323 vs szn)5.14 (+0.625 vs szn)
wOBA (model offense input)0.326 (+0.019 vs szn)0.327
K% (lower is better)23.4% (+0.7% vs szn)15.6% (-2.9% vs szn)

Over the last 30 days the Rays have been the better offense, 0.327 wOBA to 0.326.

Season profile

Full Stats page →
MetricMetsRays
Record62-7783-55
Run differential / game (team quality)-0.36+0.37
Runs scored / game (offense, season)4.124.52
Runs allowed / game (defense, season, lower better)4.484.15
Season OPS0.6930.733
K% season (lower is better)22.7%18.5%
OPS vs opposing hand (season)0.6920.754

Season-long team quality, not recent form. Run differential and run environment come from the season standings; splits for all 30 teams live on the Stats page, including the run environment table.

Every team on today's slate, on any two axes you pick. Mets and Rays are highlighted.

Mets
Combined risk
5.6 Normal
Fatigue
5.7 Normal
Efficiency
5.3 Average
Rays
Combined risk
6.1 Normal
Fatigue
7.0 Tired
Efficiency
6.8 Effective

Risk is what the model actually uses: fatigue blended with how well the pen has pitched. High fatigue with high efficiency is a tired pen that is still getting outs.

MetricMetsRays
Fatigue5.7/10, Normal7.0/10, Tired
Efficiency5.3/10, Average6.8/10, Effective
Combined risk5.6/10, Normal6.1/10, Normal
Relief innings, last 7 days24.020.0
Back-to-back arms64
7-day ERA3.751.80
7-day WHIP1.251.05

Fatigue measures workload. Efficiency measures recent run prevention. Combined risk is what the moneyline and totals systems use.

Run total projection

Full Totals Projections →
LyDia projection
8.6
Market total
13.5
Projected away runs
3.3
Projected home runs
4.5
Over price
+106
Under price
-114
New York Mets team total
3.3 projected
Line 3.5 · O +100 / U -122
No team-total lean
Tampa Bay Rays team total
4.5 projected
Line 4.5 · O +104 / U -124
No team-total lean

The model projects 4.9 runs below the market total. A research lean still requires a setup rating of at least 7.0/10. Team totals remain research-only until their graded sample is established.

More games today

All matchups →

Every LyDia pick, graded in public

Free daily model card by email, or open today's full slate. Membership adds delivery before first pitch.

Today's picks Membership

Model outputs are not guarantees. LyDia provides analysis and education only. Every official pick remains visible on the Results page. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.