MLB matchup analysis

Cubs vs Reds Prediction, Odds and Model Pick

Sunday, September 20, 2026 at Great American Ball Park · 1:40 PM ET

Pass

Leo decision: Pass on Cubs vs Reds

Lab Rating
4.9/10
Model lean
Cubs 63.2%
Market probability
59.0%
Model edge
+4.2%
Best moneyline
-154
Sportsbooks checked
7
Leo model
63.2%
Market
59.0%

The case for Chicago Cubs

Why Leo leans Chicago Cubs
Leo's model makes Chicago Cubs 63.2% to win. No single factor dominates — the starting pitcher matchup, the bullpen, recent bats tilt the same way, enough to lean Chicago Cubs even though it does not clear the bar for a high-confidence pick.

The case for Cincinnati Reds

The case is thin
The model finds little going Cincinnati Reds's way — it trails on the pitching plan, bullpen, and recent form. The main path to a Cincinnati Reds win is variance.

Why it is not official

Setup quality below the bar
Lab Rating is 4.9/10, under the 7.2/10 required for an official pick.

Why the setup score is what it is

Conviction: 4.08/10
Leo leans toward Chicago Cubs, but not strongly enough to earn full conviction credit.
Pitching plan: 0/40
David Peterson rates 51 on Leo's pitcher score, judged on its own merits (50-80 is the credited range). Average or below by that measure, so it earns little or none of the available credit here -- independent of who the opponent is throwing.
Offense: 45.02/50
Chicago Cubs's recent offensive form clearly outpaces Cincinnati Reds's over the tracked windows.

Why the price is what it is

Team strength: 56.7%
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, Leo's team-strength model alone makes Chicago Cubs 56.7% to win. Everything below moves the price from this starting point.
Pitcher score gap: 4 points
The pitcher-score gap favors Chicago Cubs by 4 points. This is the biggest single mover of the price -- a large gap moves it a lot, a small gap barely moves it.
Bullpen adjustment: +0.039
The bullpen-fatigue gap between the two pens nudges the price toward Chicago Cubs. This moves the price less than the starting pitchers do, since a starter covers more of the game than the bullpen.
Net effect: 56.7% -> 63.2%
Team strength alone had Chicago Cubs at 56.7%. After the pitcher and bullpen terms, the price is 63.2% -- the same number shown as Model Lean above.
The verdict Leo passes. The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.
Read the full model output

The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.

Game information

MatchupChicago Cubs at Cincinnati Reds
DateSunday, September 20, 2026
First pitch1:40 PM ET
VenueGreat American Ball Park
Starting pitchersDavid Peterson vs Rhett Lowder
WeatherGame-time forecast: 90°F, 1% precipitation chance, 4 mph wind from N.

Starting pitcher matchup

Full Pitcher Matchup Tool →
David PetersonCubs · LHP
vs
Rhett LowderReds · RHP
MetricCubsReds
Pitching planTraditional starterTraditional starter
Expected innings54⅔
ThrowsLR
Leo pitcher score (higher is better)5144
ERA (lower is better)5.006.01
WHIP (lower is better)1.531.55
K/9 (higher is better)8.37.1
K-BB% (higher is better)10.4%8.1%
K% (higher is better)20.4%17.4%
BB% (lower is better)10.0%9.3%
BB/9 (lower is better)4.03.8
HR/9 (lower is better)0.91.3
Ground-ball rate60.7%47.4%
Fly-ball rate39.3%52.6%

Pitcher edge: Leo gives David Peterson a 7-point edge over Rhett Lowder, driven mainly by ERA (5.00 vs 6.01) and HR/9 (0.90 vs 1.27).

How to read this: the scorecards above name the starters; every number lives in this table.

Strikeout Projections Full strikeout projections →

David Peterson strikeouts
5.7 Leo projected Ks
No strikeout line posted when this page was generated
Rhett Lowder strikeouts
3.0 Leo projected Ks
No K play · -0.5K difference is below Leo's 0.7K threshold
Market 3.5K · O -122 / U +100 · 4 books

Same data source as the Pitcher Matchup Tool, where every starter on the slate is compared side by side.

Cubs are 5-5 in their last 10 and averaging 5.2 runs per game over the last 15 days; Reds are 3-7 in their last 10 and averaging 3.8 runs per game over the last 15 days. On the season Cubs carry the better run differential per game (+0.93 against -1.00).

MetricCubsReds
Last 105-53-7
Last 10 by venue (away team on the road, home team at home)3-7 on the road5-5 at home
OPS, last 15 days0.7790.670
wOBA, last 15 days (hot/cold read)0.3440.297
Runs per game, last 15 days5.23.8
K% last 15 days (lower is better)16.4%27.2%

Last 15 days only. Hot and cold streaks for all 30 teams live on the Stats page.

30-day offense

Full offense tool →
Last 30 daysCubsReds
OPS0.850 (+0.079 vs szn)0.721 (+0.021 vs szn)
Runs per game6.25 (+0.923 vs szn)4.21 (+0.105 vs szn)
wOBA (model offense input)0.369 (+0.030 vs szn)0.317 (+0.007 vs szn)
K% (lower is better)17.2% (-3.8% vs szn)25.4%

Over the last 30 days the Cubs have been the better offense, 0.369 wOBA to 0.317. They are running hot against their own season line (+0.030 wOBA). Reds are striking out at 25.4% over the window — something the opposing starter can lean on.

Season profile

Full Stats page →
MetricCubsReds
Record86-6972-83
Run differential / game (team quality)+0.93-1.00
Runs scored / game (offense, season)5.334.14
Runs allowed / game (defense, season, lower better)4.405.14
Season OPS0.7710.701
K% season (lower is better)21.0%25.5%
OPS vs opposing hand (season)0.761Not available

Season-long team quality, not recent form. Run differential and run environment come from the season standings; splits for all 30 teams live on the Stats page, including the run environment table.

Every team on today's slate, on any two axes you pick. Cubs and Reds are highlighted.

Cubs
Combined risk
5.2 Normal
Fatigue
5.0 Normal
Efficiency
4.6 Average
Reds
Combined risk
6.5 Tired
Fatigue
7.1 Tired
Efficiency
6.3 Effective

Risk is what the model actually uses: fatigue blended with how well the pen has pitched. High fatigue with high efficiency is a tired pen that is still getting outs.

MetricCubsReds
Fatigue5.0/10, Normal7.1/10, Tired
Efficiency4.6/10, Average6.3/10, Effective
Combined risk5.2/10, Normal6.5/10, Tired
Relief innings, last 7 days19.730.0
Back-to-back arms36
7-day ERA4.122.40
7-day WHIP1.631.13

Fatigue measures workload. Efficiency measures recent run prevention. Combined risk is what the moneyline and totals systems use.

Run total projection

Full Totals Projections →
Leo projection
10.2
Market total
10.5
Projected away runs
6.2
Projected home runs
4.0
Over price
-126
Under price
+105
Chicago Cubs team total
6.2 projected
Line 5.5 · O +102 / U -120
Over research lean (+0.7)
Cincinnati Reds team total
4.0 projected
Line 4.5 · O +106 / U -132
No team-total lean

The model and market are close. Team totals remain research-only until their graded sample is established.

More games today

All matchups →

Every Leo pick, graded in public

Free daily model card by email, or open today's full slate. Membership adds delivery before first pitch.

Today's picks Membership

Model outputs are not guarantees. Leo provides analysis and education only. Every official pick remains visible on the Results page. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.