MLB matchup analysis

Padres vs Rays Prediction, Odds and Model Pick

Friday, August 28, 2026 at Tropicana Field · 7:10 PM ET

Pass

LyDia decision: Pass on Padres vs Rays

Lab Rating
4.6/10
Model lean
Rays 53.7%
Market probability
54.6%
Model edge
-0.8%
Best moneyline
-128
Sportsbooks checked
5
LyDia model
53.7%
Market
54.6%

The case for Tampa Bay Rays

Why LyDia leans Tampa Bay Rays
LyDia's model makes Tampa Bay Rays 53.7% to win. No single factor dominates — team strength and the run environment tilt slightly this way, enough to lean Tampa Bay Rays even though it does not clear the bar for a high-confidence pick.

The case for San Diego Padres

Their bats are hot: +0.011 wOBA
San Diego Padres is outhitting its own season form over the last 15 days.

Why it is not official

Below the 61.0% official gate
Win probability is 53.7%. LyDia does not make a game official below 61.0%, no matter how good the price is. This is a value spot, not a high-confidence winner.
Setup quality below the bar
Lab Rating is 4.6/10, under the 7.2/10 required for an official pick.
Cold stretch at the plate
Tampa Bay Rays is -0.029 wOBA below its own season form.

Why the setup score is what it is

Conviction: 0/10
LyDia's own win probability for Tampa Bay Rays (53.7%) is close enough to a coin flip that the rating credits little or no conviction -- credit only starts above 55%.
Pitching plan: 24/30
Shane McClanahan rates 73 on LyDia's pitcher score, judged on its own merits (50-80 is the credited range). That is a strong start on its own, and it earns most or all of the available credit here.
Bullpen: 5/10
Tampa Bay Rays's bullpen carries a real edge over San Diego Padres's tonight.
Offense: 17.17/50
Tampa Bay Rays's recent form does not clearly outpace San Diego Padres's.

Why the price is what it is

Team strength: 53.8%
Before any pitcher or bullpen adjustment, LyDia's team-strength model alone makes Tampa Bay Rays 53.8% to win. Everything below moves the price from this starting point.
Pitcher score gap: 1 points
The pitcher-score gap favors Tampa Bay Rays by 1 points. This is the biggest single mover of the price -- a large gap moves it a lot, a small gap barely moves it.
Net effect: 53.8% -> 53.7%
Team strength alone had Tampa Bay Rays at 53.8%. After the pitcher and bullpen terms, the price is 53.7% -- the same number shown as Model Lean above.
The verdict LyDia passes. The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.
Read the full model output

The combined Lab Rating did not clear the official threshold.

Final result

Padres 4, Rays 9

How the analysis held up

Tampa Bay Rays won, the side LyDia's model favored.

Casey Mize (No clear pitching-plan edge), the starter LyDia's pitcher score favored, actually outpitched Shane McClanahan: 5.0 IP, 2 ER (3.60 ERA) against 5.2 IP, 3 ER (4.76 ERA). The edge held up.

The Tampa Bay Rays bullpen was not flagged pregame, but it had a night worth noting: 0 earned runs allowed over 3.1 relief innings (0.00 ERA) — quietly better than the pregame read implied. Note: 1 of the runs charged to the Tampa Bay Rays pitching staff overall was unearned — not something the bullpen's stuff should be blamed for.

Game information

MatchupSan Diego Padres at Tampa Bay Rays
DateFriday, August 28, 2026
First pitch7:10 PM ET
VenueTropicana Field
Starting pitchersCasey Mize vs Shane McClanahan
WeatherGame-time forecast: 80°F, 7% precipitation chance, 1 mph wind from NE.

Starting pitcher matchup

Full Pitcher Matchup Tool →
Casey MizePadres · RHP
vs
Shane McClanahanRays · LHP
MetricPadresRays
Pitching planTraditional starterTraditional starter
Expected innings5⅓5
ThrowsRL
LyDia pitcher score (higher is better)7273
ERA (lower is better)3.533.19
WHIP (lower is better)1.101.11
K/9 (higher is better)7.98.2
K-BB% (higher is better)15.5%13.9%
K% (higher is better)21.5%22.1%
BB% (lower is better)6.1%8.2%
BB/9 (lower is better)2.23.0
HR/9 (lower is better)0.90.7
Ground-ball rate34.4%49.4%
Fly-ball rate65.6%50.6%

Pitcher edge: LyDia gives Shane McClanahan a 1-point edge over Casey Mize, driven mainly by HR/9 (0.72 vs 0.90) and ERA (3.19 vs 3.53).

How to read this: the scorecards above name the starters; every number lives in this table.

Strikeout Projections Full strikeout projections →

Casey Mize strikeouts
2.8 LyDia projected Ks
Official pick: UNDER 3.5K · -0.7K difference
Market 3.5K · O -136 / U +110 · 3 books
Shane McClanahan strikeouts
4.3 LyDia projected Ks
No K play · -0.2K difference is below LyDia's 0.7K threshold
Market 4.5K · O -104 / U -122 · 3 books

Same data source as the Pitcher Matchup Tool, where every starter on the slate is compared side by side.

Padres are 6-4 in their last 10 and averaging 3.9 runs per game over the last 15 days; Rays are 5-5 in their last 10 and averaging 3.5 runs per game over the last 15 days. Season run differential separates them by almost nothing (+0.09 against +0.39).

MetricPadresRays
Last 106-45-5
Last 10 by venue (away team on the road, home team at home)5-5 on the road4-6 at home
OPS, last 15 days0.7210.659
wOBA, last 15 days (hot/cold read)0.3230.294
Runs per game, last 15 days3.93.5
K% last 15 days (lower is better)21.1%15.7%

Last 15 days only. Hot and cold streaks for all 30 teams live on the Stats page.

30-day offense

Full offense tool →
Last 30 daysPadresRays
OPS0.725 (+0.023 vs szn)0.728
Runs per game4.39 (+0.148 vs szn)4.61 (+0.100 vs szn)
wOBA (model offense input)0.322 (+0.011 vs szn)0.319
K% (lower is better)19.7% (-2.0% vs szn)16.2% (-2.3% vs szn)

Over the last 30 days the Padres have been the better offense, 0.322 wOBA to 0.319. They are running hot against their own season line (+0.011 wOBA).

Season profile

Full Stats page →
MetricPadresRays
Record72-6279-54
Run differential / game (team quality)+0.09+0.39
Runs scored / game (offense, season)4.244.51
Runs allowed / game (defense, season, lower better)4.164.12
Season OPS0.7030.731
K% season (lower is better)21.7%18.5%
OPS vs opposing hand (season)0.6870.753

Season-long team quality, not recent form. Run differential and run environment come from the season standings; splits for all 30 teams live on the Stats page, including the run environment table.

Every team on today's slate, on any two axes you pick. Padres and Rays are highlighted.

Padres
Combined risk
5.1 Normal
Fatigue
6.4 Tired
Efficiency
7.6 Dominant
Rays
Combined risk
5.1 Normal
Fatigue
5.9 Normal
Efficiency
6.6 Effective

Risk is what the model actually uses: fatigue blended with how well the pen has pitched. High fatigue with high efficiency is a tired pen that is still getting outs.

MetricPadresRays
Fatigue6.4/10, Tired5.9/10, Normal
Efficiency7.6/10, Dominant6.6/10, Effective
Combined risk5.1/10, Normal5.1/10, Normal
Relief innings, last 7 days24.019.7
Back-to-back arms34
7-day ERA0.752.75
7-day WHIP0.960.81

Fatigue measures workload. Efficiency measures recent run prevention. Combined risk is what the moneyline and totals systems use.

Run total projection

Full Totals Projections →
LyDia projection
6.1
Market total
8.0
Projected away runs
3.6
Projected home runs
1.7
Over price
-102
Under price
-113
San Diego Padres team total
3.6 projected
Line 3.5 · O -102 / U -120
No team-total lean
Tampa Bay Rays team total
1.7 projected
Line 3.5 · O -122 / U +100
Under research lean (-1.8)

The model projects 1.9 runs below the market total. A research lean still requires a setup rating of at least 7.0/10. Team totals remain research-only until their graded sample is established.

More games today

All matchups →

Every LyDia pick, graded in public

Free daily model card by email, or open today's full slate. Membership adds delivery before first pitch.

Today's picks Membership

Model outputs are not guarantees. LyDia provides analysis and education only. Every official pick remains visible on the Results page. 21+. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.